Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Addiction Denial

Don Tapscott’s book, Grown Up Digital, generally has a positive and supportive outlook on the future of the latest generation, the ‘Net Geners’. However, as an indicator of fair research, the author has also included a list of concerns and critiques of this generation ; one of them being that these ‘screenagers’ are addicted to the internet, have degrading social skills, and lack the time for activities that support a healthy lifestyle. It is suggested that the combination of these attributes have lead, or will lead to the emergence of an age group full of awkward, over-weight people.


In response to the degrading social skills argument, there are two sides to the story. I would agree that advancements in technology, specifically the convenience of internet and mobile phone based IM (instant messaging) has drastically changed the format of our interaction with each other. While many of us 'net geners' use abbreviated words in our text messaging or while chatting online, I wouldn't go so far as to say that it's lowering the standard of our social skills. In fact, many adults, parents, and perhaps even a few grandparents have adapted to this style of communication because they have realized that it's not inappropriate and gets the message across in a highly efficient manner.

But most of the critics, [who happen to be adults that don't want to change their comfortable old ways], don't realize that advancements in online social networking have actually increased the social activity of this generation - not a day goes by where I don't receive an invite on Facebook to some kind of social event. I've had friends who were shy, and liked to keep to themselves turn into party animals thanks to the awesome power of online social networks. So I'm not at all concerned for the well-being of this generation because believe it or not, we actually end up spending most of our time 'hanging out'.

Sunday, January 24, 2010

Facebook Walking On a Thin Line

There is no doubt that Facebook has rapidly climbed the ladder of the competitive social networking market, more than doubling the user base of the previously popular MySpace since its debut in 2004. In fact, it has become popular enough to be a substitute to exchanging numbers with people we meet, and reason enough to call you a weirdo if you aren't on Facebook.

Being a user myself, I have noticed the growing amount of concern regarding issues of privacy, such as data mining, and potential monetizing of personal information. It seems that we now have evidence of the latter, as a Facebook user named Harman Bajwa had his vanity URL (facebook.com/harman) revoked two days ago, for apparently 'violating' the site's policies. Meanwhile, Facebook made a sales deal for the vanity URL with Harman International. Here is a sample of the official reason for the revocation by Facebook:

"A Facebook username should have a clear connection to one’s identity. In addition, impersonating anyone or anything is prohibited." (read the full article)

Loosely translated, that basically means, we are making money from your vanity URL and accusing you of some BS policy violation. As far as I can tell, Harman Bajwa had every right to be using the URL, since it's his real identity, and in no way attempting to impersonate anyone or anything.

It will be interesting to see whether Harman will get his URL back, or receive some sort of compensation. With over 300 million users world-wide, Facebook has adopted a lot of power over the social networking medium, and with that power, one would hope, comes responsibility.

Friday, January 22, 2010

First!

I'll be using this blog to write down my individual 'pro' thoughts and also draw attention to matters that I find important, and hopefully interesting. Check back soon for an update!